No “Fights” For Christmas
When the announcement about “The Great Christmas Light Fight” being cancelled started circulating through the Christmas Facebook groups, it felt like a small tremor in the holiday world. People were sharing the TMZ link, speculating about what it meant, and wondering whether the show was gone for good or simply taking a break. I made one comment, only one, and it was meant to be gentle. I wrote that I would love to see networks return to the kind of Christmas TV shows that celebrated the hobby without the competitive angle. I mentioned that over the years I had seen comments about prize money and about how some displays were portrayed, and that those things never did much for my holiday spirit. I explained that this was why I stopped watching after the first season.
That Single Post Opened The Floodgates…
Within hours, I started getting messages asking why I hated the show, why I was celebrating its cancellation, and why I was being negative about something so many people enjoyed. The truth is, I don’t hate the show. I never have. I understand why people are upset. Many viewers loved it, learned from it, and made it part of their holiday traditions. For decorators who were planning to apply or already preparing, the disappointment is real. When you invest that much into something, any change feels personal. That’s exactly why I wrote this article. Not to tear anything down or criticize those who enjoyed or participated in it, but to clarify my perspective and explain it in a way that’s clear and respectful.
To understand why I am glad the show is stepping aside, at least for now, it helps to look back at what it became. “The Great Christmas Light Fight” premiered in 2013 and ran for thirteen seasons. Over that time, it produced eighty two episodes. Each episode featured four families competing for a fifty thousand dollar prize. If you do the math, that means the show awarded more than four million dollars in prize money over its run. The number of displays featured is not officially published, but with four families per episode, the total comes to an estimated three hundred and twenty eight displays. That is a remarkable amount of creativity, effort, and electricity showcased on national television.
The Show’s Premise Was Simple…
Families decorated their homes with elaborate Christmas displays, and judges evaluated them based on design, use of lights, and holiday spirit. On paper, it sounds like a celebration of the hobby. In practice, it slowly drifted into something else. The title itself hinted at the shift. Christmas TV and fighting do not belong in the same sentence. Yet the show leaned into the idea that decorating was a competition, a battle, a contest to be won rather than a joy to be shared.
Christmas lights have always been about warmth, generosity, and community. They are about transforming a dark winter night into something magical. They are about creating memories for children and neighbors. They are about the quiet satisfaction of stepping back from your yard, seeing the glow, and knowing you brought a little more light into the world. Turning that into a competition never sat comfortably with me. It felt like the heart of the hobby was being reshaped into something it was never meant to be.
The Focus On Money Did Not Help…
The fifty thousand dollar prize became the gravitational center of each episode. Instead of celebrating creativity for its own sake, the narrative often revolved around how much contestants spent, how many lights they used, or how their display compared to the others. The show unintentionally created an arms race. Bigger displays. Brighter displays. More expensive displays. The magic of Christmas lights, the wonder and nostalgia that make them special, was overshadowed by the spectacle.
Another issue that bothered me was the editing. Reality television is known for shaping narratives to heighten drama, and “The Great Christmas Light Fight” was no exception. Too often, the show seemed to frame hobbyists as arrogant, competitive, or dismissive of others. I know these people. I have met them. I have stood in their yards and talked with them about controllers, sequencing, and the best way to waterproof a pixel. They are not arrogant. They are passionate. They are generous. They are the kind of people who spend thousands of hours creating displays that they give away to the public for free. Seeing them edited into characters that did not reflect who they are felt unfair.
Christmas TV That Isn’t A Fight…
This is why I often found myself missing the older Christmas TV specials. Before the era of competitive holiday programming, Christmas decorating shows had a very different tone. They were fun. They were inspiring. They were informative. They made you want to grab a ladder and start decorating. “Crazy Christmas Lights” was always my favorite because it captured the heart of the hobby in a way that felt genuine. It focused on families who decorated simply because they loved doing it, and it treated their creativity with a sense of joy rather than competition. Watching those episodes reminded me that Christmas TV displays are meant to inspire, to teach, and to bring people together. They were never about winning. They were about celebrating the many ways people express love, tradition, and community through light.
“Invasion of the Christmas Lights” carried that same spirit. It followed decorators across the country and highlighted their passion without turning them into opponents. “What’s With That Christmas House” did the same, leaning into the charm and personality of each display rather than trying to rank them. These shows celebrated the hobby for what it was. They made the viewer feel included rather than judged. They made the hobby feel accessible rather than competitive. Those Christmas TV shows about decorating have always brought people a smile.
With “The Great Christmas Light Fight” stepping aside this year, there is an opportunity to rediscover what made holiday decorating specials magical in the first place. Christmas does not need a scoreboard. It needs stories. It needs creativity. It needs the kind of programming that reminds us why we decorate in the first place.
What Does This Mean For Us…
This shift also comes at a meaningful time for me personally. For the past three years, we have researched and written articles about all kinds of holiday topics. Crafts, recipes, indoor decorations, outdoor lighting, and everything in between. We poured a lot of time into those pieces, but the engagement on social media made it clear that they were not what people were looking for. The articles are not going away. They will always be available for anyone who wants them. But they will not be the focus for 2026.
This year, we decided to write the articles we actually want to write. Articles about displays. Articles about building, planning, sequencing, and creating. Articles that help people bring their own ideas to life. Over the next several months, we will be sharing guides, tips, and insights to help you build your own display, whether you are just starting out or looking to take your setup to the next level.
As we look ahead to the 2026 season, I feel a sense of optimism. Not just for my own display, but for displays everywhere. The absence of “The Great Christmas Light Fight” might open the door for a new kind of holiday programming, one that celebrates creativity without turning it into a contest. One that highlights the joy of decorating rather than the pressure to win. One that remembers that Christmas is not a fight. It is a celebration. The season will be a little quieter without it, and in that quiet, the true spirit of Christmas might shine a little brighter.
Stay safe, learn often, use imagination, and keep lighting up the world!



